<!--quoteo(post=1314758:date=11 Feb 2007, 19:44:name=axsling)-->QUOTE(axsling @ 11 Feb 2007, 19:44) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->Klart vi må begrense negativt utslipp, skulle faen bare mangle, verden kveles jo av miljøfientlige utslipp i alle varianter. Skal mine kommende barnebarn plages av mine utslipp?..NEI. Fyr på med avgifter å øk bevilgningene til kollktivtransporten.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Så du er FOR økt co2 utslipp?
"The use of DPF devices actually increases carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. CO2 is the primary gas associated with global warming, and its reduction is targeted by the Kyoto Protocol. The additional CO2 is created both through the operation of the DPF itself, as well as through the production of ultra low sulphur diesel fuel (ULSD). In addition, using ULSD results in slightly poorer fuel efficiency (despite its higher cost), which contributes to higher fuel consumption and an increase in CO2 emissions."
Så du er FOR økt co2 utslipp?
"The use of DPF devices actually increases carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. CO2 is the primary gas associated with global warming, and its reduction is targeted by the Kyoto Protocol. The additional CO2 is created both through the operation of the DPF itself, as well as through the production of ultra low sulphur diesel fuel (ULSD). In addition, using ULSD results in slightly poorer fuel efficiency (despite its higher cost), which contributes to higher fuel consumption and an increase in CO2 emissions."
Man kapper ikke i en lux-man hæver dem!